承认白人更优越？马凯硕对老英国，中国对世界，臆想联翩：

Singapore has grown into an wonderful exemplary society in today’s world. Chinese traditional culture blend with tolerance to Indian and Malian. Like Tang Dynasty’s Xi’an. It is smartly balanced in world geopolitics between super powers, all worked out well with economic successes.

In contrast, the old UK has fallen, for sure.

But UK drags the Western world down, including its old rival-ally America, with its Western wisdom dominating the white race circle. It can only fail on one thing in its course, which is the modern socialist slavery attempt on migrants, that its new creation through recent two decades, will hunt themselves down. What I recognize is: the unspoken idea of Western’s is to allow all middle-class own a shared class of low-life cheap-labor slaves, a socialist-racist hided behind the politically-correct and white-mercy.

US politicians followed UK closely based on the Western democracy ideology. In reality, the unspoken is their white slave-master nature. After overthrown anti-migrant Trump, it boosted migrants in millions with the open border.

A very old idea found its way back to the modern societies. All the countries need “peasants” to serve, that is a fact. Not only in China who uses peasants to build its miracle civil constructions and produce exported goods, but also in US: the labor class and hillbillies are too expensive, “white-trash” are too lazy; blacks was too sensitive to their civil rights, as well lazy; Mexican-poor is the perfect and a best match. But the problem is: all these slaves, BLM and white-trash are not happy, but they are very good in civil turmoils if not satisfied. It is not like old black slaves who obeyed their farmer masters. They had their own ideas and rights. While muslim migrants have strong religion and culture agendas.

How the white middle-class keep their slavering privilege in California will have no resolutions with Federal government under Trump’s administration. However back in the history, they would never be co-exist with Lincoln who founded GOP. Ironically, in this new civil war, either sides don’t want to liberate slaves. One side wants to keep them being slaved, the other side wants to kick them back to their home country. But how can a modern society survive without a slave class? Unless politicians really meant to serve peoples, which the two most powerful states in the world, US and China, both labeled as so, but both failed.

I had a friend who we made in former West Germany. He was a 1970s young artist, a retired professor, but not a far-right at all. I said: EU and US actually had become direct enemies after the Cold War. Germany wanted to become independent from US, who had met this great opportunity. Just needed get rid of the old enemies of England and France, led the EU and ruled the Eurasian economically, with Russian natural resources and China market as well downstream industries. By that time, German exports took over 1/2 of EU imports and was the world’s 2nd largest trade-surplus country, Euro was used for Eurasian trade, with 10% stead annual increase.

But later, just one second-year into the Ukraine war, Germany became a trade-deficit country, and deeply in-debt. It jumped over the cliff becoming a turmoil country, with a politically-correct struggle against muslim migrant, far-right vs fart-left activists and former-DDR. All is the result of failed social economic and livelihood, following a NATO aggression of war to Russian.

But this friend was suddenly dead by an odd tumor operation. He dropped a wonderful modern industrial heritage program that I planned to count on his local enthusiasm, along along with our fascinating intellectual conversations. The latter I missed the most.

同日：

When China Controls the World。给我看这篇“中国优越”的…

This Professor and China enthusist : “90% of Chinese think they are the Han native? “
Don’t you know, Professor, It is because that it IS 90% plus of population in China which is Han, that is the fact. What is this “uniqueness” you are talking about about?

“Why China’s 1989 civil turmoil did not end up like Soviet’s dissolve?”
Don’t you know, Professor, it happened before USSR’s dissolve. What a drag to make up a reason for all mainland Chinese were united as Han nation?

Read the comment of in Chinese! You succeeded as even a Chinese mainlander considered that you are the true Western wiseman seeing things through: Chinese had a different system to beat up Western social model.

The professor’s statements, is simply saying that: colonizing greater lands was Han’s unique invention and success. But the only difference here, in a simple logic, is that Han did it in expansion on land, instead Westerns’, did overseas.

For example: a Tibetan does not consider himself as a Han. Though it is the smallest population but it occupied the largest land territory. The situation is: now Tibet is under China’s later governing. This in fact has no argument than indigent peoples all over the world they, must have admitted that they were under a white governing or they were themselves.
That is why the world, after colonist period, became 200 countries, while before WWII there was only 60, Who is willingly wanted to be consolidated under other governor of other race? Are you telling me that if one people’s land was concurred by another, they it united into the same race? But still in some territories like US who stats as United States instead of UK territories like Canada.

Between Chinese and Westerns, are we competing who can keep greater territories? Han People chose to stay together, in comparison of American wants to stay out of UK, is just people’s choice about governing. There is no better or worse, but situation-driven.

You talk about it is Confucius philosophy that consolidated the Chinese under Han. Didn’t you know there were other One-hundred Schools with different philosophies before Confucius? The later Emperor Qin and Han banded them all. Go back to the Tibetan case, you determined that he believes in Confucius? So that he consider himself a Han or Chinese?
Confucius in his era did not have any interaction so as concepts about other races. It was just kingdoms and wars among different clans of Han. In the most battled territories there were no other ethnic-base territories.
Further more, does an Indian considering himself united to a western civilization? But he chooce under the situation, he is a modern American.

Being governed by other rase, is really a choice by situation, no matter who is governing, there is no right or wrong.
Han decided and succeeded to kill Mongolian after the latter concurred and ruled China for 90+ years. But It is also Han’s choice, later, to be ruled under Manchurian, they actually invited Qing Empire (the Manchurian race) to walk through The Great Wall for a 40-year battle on their own land, to finish Han’s faction of Li Zicheng and then finishing the Ming Empire of their own race. Then it took 200+ years to corrupt Manchurian empire, by getting the real the Han race the real power to control the country. That was just a strategy under situations. And later Han ruled everybody, and kept most of territories that Manchurian’s concurred, and even used the name Central Nation and Manchurian Emperor Kongxi created.

These, does not prove anything a modern state’s governing is so right in its consistent model or system. It is a series of coincidence among races, clans, their choices under situations and circumstance. It is a dynamic matter of the history. What can these prove who is more powerful or rightful as its correctness to rule its ever greater territories, or even the world?

Certainly Han’s modern China, as well as its predecessor Manchurian’s Qing Empire, has been having a hard time keeping all territories once very large: Ciberia, Mongolia, South China Seas and Taiwan… The considered humiliation (but no difference than UK lost America, I think), and it further worried about “separatists” growing in the New Territory (Xinjiang), the Inner Mongolia, Tibet, Guangxi and Ningxia Autonomous Regions. Wouldn’t every colonist country have worried about the nations’ dividing?

Choice based on situations, control situations, or utilize situations, which is the politics of factions of humans. Nations, races or clans are just more a figure of speech that people use, under certain governing system. Let’s not try to “see through it” and find who is more powerful about it.